YouTube is another provider that is not immune to automated flagging. In 2015 Facebook exercised similar censorship when it removed a photo of a 19th century painting, and again when it censored images of the prophet Muhammad in Turkey.įERVENT MODERATION CAN HAVE ABSURD AND CENSORIOUS RESULTS TWEET THISĪlthough protecting the interest of one of its partners was not intentional, Twitter demonstrated that it is able to and will restrict content. In September 2012, Facebook removed a cartoon of a bare-chested Eve in the Garden of Eden that was published by The New Yorker due to Facebook's policy to remove content that is sexually loaded. Kevin Bankston, Director, Open Technology Institute, said that fervent moderation can have "absurd and censorious" results. Adults should have the right to access what they want and share what they want online except under circumstances that exploit or do harm to individuals, particularly children, who cannot adequately defend or protect themselves. The quality and appropriateness of online content is subjective and should not be restricted solely because individuals or groups express opposition or discomfort. Under the law, consenting adult participants can produce, distribute and purchase these materials. Though seen as obscene and offensive to some, pornography is not prohibited in the United States. ![]() Community groups also try to limit what can be shown or displayed.Īccess to pornography on the Internet remains a contentious issue. The majority of users support website policies that prohibit hate speech or obscene content, despite the fact that much of the prohibited speech is protected under First Amendment principles. Many websites do so to protect individuals from obscene or slanderous material or do their best to avoid potentially offending visitors or contributors. American companies can also restrict content. Governments are not the only restrictive bodies. Despite strong public opposition, these types of bills continue to be proposed.ĬISPA WOULD ALLOW WARRANTLESS SEARCHES AND SHARING OF PERSONAL DATA TWEET THIS This bill allows companies to monitor user information and encourages them to share it with the government. The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) of 2015 was introduced in Senate in March 2015. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) would allow warrantless searches and sharing of personal data among and between private companies and the government. More than three years after SOPA's and PIPA's rejections, there are other lesser-known bills pending in Congress that would limit Internet users' freedom and invade their privacy by allowing certain entities to access personal data. The bills attempted to protect music artists and corporations from copyright infringement by limiting Americans' freedom on the Internet through the exercise of regulatory control over much of the online space. In 2012, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) failed to pass because of public outcry and protests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |